I was reading an editorial in the Boston Globe where the author suggested that we could eliminate the overcrowded prison problem as well as save a lot of money by having alternatives to prison. He suggested it should be the choice of the convicted person, but I am not convinced it has to be that way. If it were decided by the court, then it may be a better deterrent because the person wouldn't know ahead of time which one he/she would get.
The author suggested flogging as the alternative (severe whipping). He thought ten lashes would be the equivalent of ten years in prison. I am not convinced of that either. But there are many research methods used in the insurance industry that could be used to come up with an equivalent. I have never been flogged, so I have no idea how painful it is or how long the pain lasts. But I imagine ten lashes would be a lot less severe than 10 years in prison.
But however the details are worked out, I think it is a good idea. Clearly, our prisons are overcrowded and we need to find some alternatives. I there is going to be some number of lashes or waterboarding or whatever that would be the equivalent.
What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment